Israpundit Digest

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 22,095
  • Last 7 days: 146,233
  • Last 30 days: 535,773
  • Online now: 50
fabricant de lanterneaux

Chit Chat

Recent Comments

Sponsors

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

Advertisments

”souvenirs”

December 2014
S M T W T F S
« Nov    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Archives

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

SUPPORT ISRAPUNDIT

 Donate USA  Donate
ISL
 Donate
CAN
  • November 27, 2013

    Jerusalem and EU agree on formula that allows Israel to join Horizon 2020 project

    By HERB KEINON, JPOST

    Israel and the European Union found a way on Tuesday to agree to disagree while continuing to cooperate, reaching an understanding making Israel’s participation in the EU’s flagship R&D program Horizon 2020 possible.

    Israeli officials said a compromise was found regarding the settlement guidelines issue, whereby both sides could keep their positions but continue to work together on the 80 billion euro science and innovation program.

    According to the compromise, Israel would write explicitly in an appendix to the agreement that it does not accept the guidelines, while the EU will write that the guidelines reflect European policy.


    The guidelines, published in July, stipulate that no EU grants, prizes or financial instruments, such as loans, could go to Israeli entities operating outside the Green Line, including in east Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.

    The issue of loans to Israeli entities inside the Green Line that do have operations in the territories is to be finessed so that the EU can ensure that the funds do not find their way into the settlements.

    Once the final language of the compromise is worked out, it will be brought to Jerusalem and Brussels for final approval. The first tenders for participation in Horizon 2020 are to be issued on December 10.

    The compromise agreement came after Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu decided at an urgent meeting Sunday evening that a way needed to be found to enable Israel’s participation in the program, and directed Justice Minister Tzipi Livni to do so.

    Government officials said that although Netanyahu made clear he wanted a deal, he also made clear that it could not be at any price.

    One official said that the moment he charged Livni with this task, instead of Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman or Deputy Foreign Minister Ze’ev Elkin – both of whom opposed in principle what they viewed as a European attempt to use an economic agreement to impose their political polices on Israel – it was clear a deal would be reached.

    During a day of marathon phone conversations, Livni spoke with EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton, while Economy and Trade Minister Naftali Bennett spoke with her deputy Pierre Vimont.

    While Netanyahu was under pressure from the country’s academic and research community to find a way to join the project, Ashton had also come under pressure from some leaders in various European capitals urging her to find a way to enable Israel’s participation.

    “Both sides benefit from this,” one Israeli official said. “It is good for both of us that this compromise proposal was reached, and we are happy this is behind us and common sense prevailed.”

    Just a few hours before the compromise was agreed upon, Bennett told Israel Radio that people who want to invest in Israel have the right to decide where they want – and do not want – to put their money.

    What they do not have the right to do, Bennett said, was impose their political positions in the process.

    Negotiations over this issue started in August, and from the beginning it was clear to both sides that the EU was not going to disavow the settlement guidelines – a written concretization of what has basically been EU policy for years – and that Israel would not sign a clause saying that territories that came under its administration in June 1967 were not part of Israeli territory.

    To do so, Israeli officials argued, would be essentially to forgo any future claims on those territories.

    Even before Tuesday, the EU – in an effort to make the settlement guidelines less visible in the Horizon 2020 agreement – showed flexibility and agreed that entities applying for grants would not have to sign a declaration that the money was not for operations beyond the Green Line, but rather merely click a box saying that they abide by all the stipulations of the agreement.

    One Israeli official said the guidelines will mean that Ariel University will not be eligible for EU grant money, and that the government will now have to find a way to compensate it, since it will be at an unfair disadvantage vis-à-vis the other universities eligible for EU funds.

    Israel is the only non-EU country to have been asked to join Horizon 2020 as a full partner, and is expected to pay some 600 million euros over the next seven years to take part. This is considered a worthwhile investment, however, because for every shekel contributed, it is expected to get back 150 percent in research funds and other inbound investments.

    As question marks were raised over the last few days over whether a resolution would be found to the issue, leading Israeli academics called on the government to ensure – for the sake of Israeli R&D – that Israel takes part.

    Prof. Ruth Arnon, the president of the Israel Academy of Sciences and the Humanities, characterized Israel’s participation in the program as “absolutely essential to the future of science in Israel.”

    Failing to sign the agreement, she added, would be an “irreversible disaster.”

    And Manuel Trajtenberg, chairman of the Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education in Israel, said Israeli participation was of “crucial importance.”

    “In light of the global world we live in and the quality of Israeli researchers, it is very important to develop and maintain our relationship with the academic, scientific and research community in the world,” he said.

    Danielle Ziri contributed to this report.

    Share Button
  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 8:39 am | 7 Comments »

    7 Comments to Jerusalem and EU agree on formula that allows Israel to join Horizon 2020 project

    1. NormanF says:

      The EU guidelines are anti-Semitic and racist and sought to force Israel to give it up its sovereign rights as a country.

      Israel should have walked away from this deal and told the Eurotrash to take their money and lump it.

      But Israel’s leftist academics wanted to put Israel in a position where it would have to accept the humiliating EU dikat along with the money they want for their projects as a matter of principle.

      That did not happen and while I’m not happy with this so-called compromise at least Israel gets to maintain its own side in the dispute as legitimate so a dangerous precedent was not set.

      However, this is no time for the Jewish State to lower its guard. In a hostile world, the exact opposite will be necessary more than ever.

    2. Eric R. says:

      Supposedly, Israel was to contribute $600 million to this but get $900 million in benefits. A better alternative would have been the following:

      a) Give the $600 million directly to Israeli institutions.

      b) Obtain $300 million from private sources (Mr. Adelson, you there?)

      c) Tell the EU to go take a flying f**k at a rolling donut.

    3. Laura says:

      Israel always winds up caving in in the end. If Bibi doesn’t have the backbone to stand up to Europe over this issue, he won’t bomb Iran.

    4. Laura says:

      @ Eric R.:
      I support your alternative.

    5. bernard ross says:

      Prof. Ruth Arnon, the president of the Israel Academy of Sciences and the Humanities, characterized Israel’s participation in the program as “absolutely essential to the future of science in Israel.” Failing to sign the agreement, she added, would be an “irreversible disaster.” And Manuel Trajtenberg, chairman of the Planning and Budgeting Committee of the Council for Higher Education in Israel, said Israeli participation was of “crucial importance.” “In light of the global world we live in and the quality of Israeli researchers, it is very important to develop and maintain our relationship with the academic, scientific and research community in the world,” he said.

      Are they acting honestly in their capacity as academics or are they acting in support of their personal political agenda. If gov. takes such advice seriously it is important that the advisors are not political. In reading about Prof. Arnon I am unconvinced that it is not a self serving postion, her relationship and rewards from EU are clear, and been an advisor in scientific matters to Simon Peres government. .
      http://www.jpost.com/Enviro-Tech/Israel-Academy-of-Sciences-president-Govt-must-sign-EUs-scientific-cooperation-accord-329246
      https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&ved=0CEoQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fthepeopleschronicle.in%2F%3Fp%3D20474&ei=KDiWUryPOPHesATj5oHQAQ&usg=AFQjCNFZvXkRP9mkWtL5sHRM4kgfVtpXKA&sig2=p8-leppH_Z7oPpEnIhI9Hg&bvm=bv.57155469,d.cWc
      Trajtenberg is a leftist in the peace process it appears
      http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/the-man-behind-the-panel-1.378301

    6. bernard ross says:

      http://israel21c.org/environment/agritech/israels-agriculture-seeds-taking-root-in-vietnam/?utm_source=27.11.2013&utm_campaign=November+27%2C+2013&utm_medium=email
      I do not beleive these academics as Israels advancements have not been based on Europe who appears to be creatively baknrupt. Israels advances are based on indepentent creative thought. Israels trade will lie in its ability to advance and politics will not stand in the way of nations seeking the better mousetrap. Agriculture, medicine and technology. Relations between foreing scientists and israelis would remain the same It is only this EU gov grant system that will be lessened. this grant system is not better than Israel invesitng the 6000 mill in itself. In fact it fosters the influence of gov on creativity just as it is doing here. Israel would do better to seek private investment, even in EU, Eu gov cannot even give Israel much money. I think Arnon employs a scare tactic in order to maintain the grants and rewards for herself and others. When you take money from tainted sources you will pay the price. If EU gov knew anything then they would be making the advances and would invite israel to nothing, they cannot afford to being out of the israel loop. The EU govs have invested in their belief that jews are money hungry and will do anything for money: they are being proven correct and are now smugly boasting.

    7. bernard ross says:

      My comment 6 in moderation, AGAIN.
      one link for Israel21 and I am moderated. TED, please do something about this crazy moderation software, it is haywire and pperates without logic.

    Site Membership



    Editor


      Ted Belman

      tbelman3- at- gmail.com

    Search

    Polls

    Why doesn't Bibi want to go "all the way"

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    MANTUA BOOKS (recommended)




    Tolerism2

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS


    Iran islam


    apes

    LOVE


    Sharing

    mandate4

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites