Israpundit Digest

Support Israpundit


USD

ILS

CAD

Syndication

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 0
  • Last 7 days: 0
  • Last 30 days: 0
  • Online now: 0
Los Angeles SEO

Recent Comments

Sponsors

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

”souvenirs”

Archives

Fair Use

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

Support Israpundit

USD

ILS

CND


  • June 9, 2014

    Monica Crowley: “This Is A Holy War”

    MONICA CROWLEY: This is a holy war. This is a holy war. Whether we want to see it that way or not, whether it’s politically correct to say it or not, this is the truth. And the enemy gets a veto, they get a vote as to whether or not we’re still in this war. So this commander-in-chief can come out publicly and say, repeatedly, the war is ending, it’s over, we’re bringing home our guys.

    The enemy has a vote on this and this Jihad will be perpetual until the infidel is done, gone, killed, or in submission. That is the truth of the other side. We’re in this holy war not because I’m saying it but because the enemy is saying it. We have a U.S. soldier who by all accounts now looks like he has turned and has now fighting that holy war on the other side. He better be held to account. (via The Right Scoop)

  • Posted by Ted Belman @ 9:40 am | 12 Comments »

    12 Comments to Monica Crowley: “This Is A Holy War”

    1. monostor says:

      When are we going to hear similar statements made by Israeli politicians? This is indeed a holy war and would be nice to hear that they admit it. It is possible that my memory is failing me so I don’t mind to be factually corrected.

    2. yamit82 says:

      My question who are the real enemies? The Islamist terrorists and their ideological religious determinative actions or the WEST who supports them and enables them?

      Germanizing America and the World System in Brief

      In the 1990s, under the Clinton and Blair administrations, NATO joined Germany-EU in decimating Yugoslavia and the Serbs and re-creating the Nazis’ “greater Albania” in the Balkans, now celebrated by President Bush. This Islamic terror and drug-running state, initially fronted by jihadist Alija Izetbegovic has named a street in honor of Mr. Bush who taught us that “Islam is a religion of peace.” It was with the British-created Mufti, Amin al Husseini that Hitler formed an SS division to exterminate Serbs, Jews and Roma in Yugoslavia. Al Husseini’s Arab Higher Committee later formed Fatah (“conquest”), the core of the PLO, repeatedly saved, armed, honored and enabled by Europe and the American ruling echelons. American and England seem increasingly to sway in a German-Vatican orbit. They destroy their own nations while Germany dominates Europe.

      It is noteworthy that the once-scruffy radical, Tony Blair was spiffed up and became the bridge from Bush I and Clinton to Bush II and Rodham. It was Blair who pronounced in April 1999 that the new mission of NATO was “humanitarian interventions.” A Briton is about to be ensconced as EU High commissioner in Jerusalem. As for the prospects of Ms. Rodham, the first prominent American politician to publicly call for a “Palestinian” State, the vivisection of America by the firm, Bracewell and Giuliani, if ever reported will sink the Rudy-ship raising Hillary who “has been cast as ‘tough on defense.’” Defense of what? In any case, the end-game outcome, a World Security State looms.

      Mr. Bush regularly visits Germany to correlate policy and sign documents for American– EU integration with PM Angela Merkel and Spanish EU diplomats like Jose Barroso as he did on April 30. Javier Solana, perennial EU diplomatic chief recently drove through the southern Israeli city of Sderot, now emptied of half its inhabitants, to cluck at the carnage caused by eight months of “ceasefire” Kassam rockets. (The Western-armed jihadists “fire” and the Jews “cease”). Madrid and Spain were and are main venues for the Nazi underground’s post-war sway. Note: the Bush administration brought Americans to Mesopotamia to topple Saddam (thesis) on the way to establishing Persian hegemony in the Middle East (antithesis) in order to sacrifice Israel (synthesis) to end the chaos in Mesopotamia which is said to have “no military solution.” Part of the synthesis is managed by the German-EU branch of the World Security State by its extensive sway in Tehran and Damascus. That’s Hegel (or Marx) in action. And there will be no appeal from their hand.


      Israeli Nuclear Strike On Iran Turned Back ???

      By William Thomas
      Jan 18th 2007 http://www.willthomas.net exclusive

      A recent strike by nuclear-armed Israeli Air Force fighter-bombers bound for targets in Iran was turned back after being intercepted by U.S. fighters over Iraq, this reporter has learned.

      Two sources have independently confirmed the encounter, which took place on January 7, 2007. Though the first informant offered few details beyond an initial tip, a second source long-known by this reporter to have well-placed U.S. and “non-U.S.” military and government contacts provided specific information regarding the raid, which was aimed at the radical religious ayatollahs holding ultimate power in Iran.

    3. yamit82 says:

      Crowley is a useful idiot wedded to Extreme right-wing fascist interests or she doesn’t have a clue. She supported those same Islamists by supporting Bush and Reagan.


      Israeli Nuclear Strike On Iran Turned Back ???

      By William Thomas
      Jan 18th 2007

      A recent strike by nuclear-armed Israeli Air Force fighter-bombers bound for targets in Iran was turned back after being intercepted by U.S. fighters over Iraq, this reporter has learned.

      Two sources have independently confirmed the encounter, which took place on January 7, 2007. Though the first informant offered few details beyond an initial tip, a second source long-known by this reporter to have well-placed U.S. and “non-U.S.” military and government contacts provided specific information regarding the raid, which was aimed at the radical religious ayatollahs holding ultimate power in Iran.

    4. Ted Belman says:

      @ yamit82:
      Crowley is one of the good guys.

    5. Bear Klein says:

      @ Ted Belman: Monica Crowley has her head on straight and is certainly one of the good guys!

    6. dove says:

      Actually, this is a very UNHOLY war….. the unholy will meet Hashem! :-)

    7. yamit82 says:

      @ Bear Klein:

      Monica Crowley has her head on straight and is certainly one of the good guys!

      Really??? :(

      She supported 2 disastrous and debilitating wars that drained the American treasury because they were financed by debt. Several thousand American dead and thousands more maimed and injured for life…

      The War on Terror is a Fraud: How the West has Fostered Radical Islam and Actively Keeps it Alive.

    8. yamit82 says:

      Bear Klein Said:

      Monica Crowley has her head on straight and is certainly one of the good guys!


      An Analysis of the One Party State: At the top of the political pyramid, there is not a constant trade-off between Liberal and Conservative agendas, there is only THE Agenda.

      Perhaps the most widely proliferated truism of American patriotism is that the the two-party system is a beacon of democracy. Surely, our system is better than that of Iran, where presidential candidates must be approved by a religious council, or perhaps that of Venezuela, where the majority of the media is state-owned and disseminates propaganda in each election.

      Democrats and Republicans are widely different, it seems. At least that is what their hyper-partisan bickering would imply. Bill Clinton and Barack Obama must have be unabashed liberals, otherwise why would the Republicans despise them so much? The divide between party faithfuls of different colors runs deep, with each side blaming the entirety of the countries problems on the other, often resulting in a state of pure hatred and disgust among citizens. One only needs to turn on cable news to see this as a fact.

      However, the reality is that Republican and Democrat presidents have closely followed the same agenda for half a century. The idea that American governance alternates as a sort of give-and-take between liberalism and conservatism is nothing more than a fantasy. I do not discount that there may be serious and significant differences between democrat and republican individuals, many of them Congressmen, and certainly in state legislatures. Yet at the top of the pyramid, where the power to set agendas resides, there is only the Agenda, and the primary difference between the two parties is the speed at which ‘the Agenda’ is advanced.

      It is fascinating how Bill Clinton began his presidential campaign with playing a Saxophone on live television, talking about his foray into Marijuana, reminiscing about his protest of the Vietnam war, and ended up with perhaps the most reactionary (e.g. maintaining the status quo) administration of any president in modern history. Later, Obama entered the stage as a candidate of change, only to accelerate and consolidate the hegemony of the political elite faster than any predecessor. But lets go beyond rhetoric and examine the records of the last 5 Presidents, and see exactly how similar their platforms were.

      Read more:

    9. honeybee says:

      @ yamit82:

      Eric Cantor has been defeated by the” Tea Party “candidate. Yeee Haaaaa

    10. yamit82 says:

      honeybee Said:

      Eric Cantor has been defeated by the” Tea Party “candidate. Yeee Haaaaa

      I heard, I never liked cantor not so much for political reaosn but because he is too neat in appearance and has a Southern accent. They say he is smart but his loss showed him to be complacent and arrogant. The Tea Party won in his congressional district because only 60,000 voters out of 470,000 eligible voters tuned out to vote in an open election where anyone can vote. How many democrats and independets voted against Cantor one can only speculate but I smell some democrat games here because knocking out cantor weakens the Republican Party, sets up the political bogeyman of the democrats (tea Party) as the one responsible for Cantor’s loss….A Win Win for the Democrat party.

    11. honeybee says:

      yamit82 Said:

      a Southern accent

      Yawl bite yore tongue boy!!!!!! http://youtu.be/s3AuqeI51mY

    Site Membership



    Google Site Search

    Editor

      Ted Belman

      tbelman3-at-gmail.com

    Mission

      News and Views on Israel, the Middle East, the war on terror and the clash of civilizations.

    Polls

    Will Israel attack Iran

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS

    LOVE




    Tolerism2

    Iran islam

    Sharing

    mandate4

    Daily Archives

    July 2014
    S M T W T F S
    « Jun    
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites