Israpundit Digest

Blog Traffic

Pages

Pages|Hits |Unique

  • Last 24 hours: 24,455
  • Last 7 days: 140,810
  • Last 30 days: 527,765
  • Online now: 66
Los Angeles SEO

Chit Chat

Recent Comments

Sponsors

Sponsor

Dry Bones
Dry Bones

”souvenirs”

ads

Archives

LIVE HEADLINE NEWS FEEDS
THERE IS NO DIPLOMATIC SOLUTION

SUPPORT ISRAPUNDIT

 Donate USA  Donate
ISL
 Donate
CAN
Tis the seasons for Presidential pardons
Free Pollard
Please sign the petition Ask President Obama
To commute Jonathan Pollard's unjust life sentence to time served.
  • March 26, 2013

    Nationalism and Internationalism  

    By Daniel Greenfield, Sultan Knish

    Iraq and immigration have one thing in common. Both are founded on the assumption that national political philosophies can be universally applied to any population with the same results.

    The same leftists and radical libertarians who mocked the idea that Iraqis could be successfully transformed through democracy insist millions of illegal aliens from countries every bit as violent and unstable as Iraq can be successfully transformed by giving them legal status and the vote.

    Both assumptions were and are wrong. They are both symptoms of an internationalism that assumes a favorite political philosophy that works in the United States can be applied internationally without regard for culture. And internationalism invariably undermines the nation by prioritizing an ideology over the rights and interests of the citizenry.
    (Read more…)

    Posted by Ted Belman @ 8:58 pm ET | Plink | Trackback | 2 Comments » | 807 views

    Obama said the Palestinians must accept Israel as a Jewish State.  

    By Ted Belman

    Daniel Pipes had this to say in the Washington Times:

      Then, in his Jerusalem speech last week, Obama suddenly and unexpectedly adopted in full the Israeli demand: “Palestinians must recognize that Israel will be a Jewish state.”

      That sentence breaks important new ground and cannot readily be undone. It also makes for excellent policy, for without such recognition, Palestinian acceptance of Israel is hollow, indicating only a willingness to call the future state they dominate “Israel” rather than “Palestine.”

      While not the only shift in policy announced during Obama’s trip (another: telling the Palestinians not to set preconditions for negotiations), this one looms largest because it starkly contravenes the Palestinian consensus. Bardawil may hyperbolically assert that it “shows that Obama has turned his back to all Arabs” but those ten words in fact establish a readiness to deal with the conflict’s central issue. They likely will be his most important, most lasting, and most constructive contribution to Arab-Israeli diplomacy.

    Unfortunately he is sticking with ’67 line with swaps and a divided Jerusalem

    Posted by Ted Belman @ 8:53 pm ET | Plink | Trackback | 10 Comments » | 951 views

    Site Membership



    Search

    Polls

    Why doesn't Bibi want to go "all the way"

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

    MANTUA BOOKS (recommended)




    Tolerism2

    RECOMMENDED BOOKS


    Iran islam


    apes

    LOVE


    Sharing

    mandate4

    Selected Israpundit Articles

    Miscellaneous Info

      All Politic Sites